Supreme Court asks Centre to arm forest officers in battle against poachers
Top court calls for procedures after being informed of record deaths among personnel.
Forest officials during a patrol near Digada town of Dahegaon mandal, in Kumram Bheem Asifabad district, Telangana. Submit picture.
| Photo Credit:
Leading court requires procedures after being informed of record deaths among personnel.
The Supreme Court on Friday urged the government to equip forest officers and provide them with bullet-proof vests and lorries when told that India recorded the “biggest variety of mortal casualties” amongst forest officials in the world.
Likewise checked out: When poachers have more weapons than forest authorities
Appearing before a Bench led by Chief Justice of India Sharad A. Bobde, senior advocate Shyam Divan said India represented 30% of casualties among forest rangers on the planet.
Chief Justice Bobde said forest officials were up versus an extremely powerful force.
” Profits of criminal activity remain in countless dollars. This is a worldwide crime. Just recently, I was told that the pangolin skin trade reached China because people believe they benefit particular things,” Chief Justice Bobde kept in mind.
The court stated the Centre should consider involving leading organisations such as the CBI to help the forest staff.
” There should even be a different wing or wildlife department in the Enforcement Directorate with tidy officials to track and examine criminal offenses of the poachers and the proceeds of their criminal offenses … The amounts included are big and justify the development of a separate wing by the ED,” Chief Justice Bobde dealt with Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre.
Chief Justice Bobde pointed out how forest rangers in Assam were equipped and “no one attempts come near them”.
” But in States like Madhya Pradesh, they roam around with lathis In Karnataka, forest guards remain in chappals and [carry] simply lathis … In these States, forest guards are slapped around by poachers,” the CJI observed.
He asked Maharashtra counsel Rahul Chitnis why forest officers in the State were not armed. Mr. Chitnis, however, firmly insisted that they were.
” However why this unequal scenario amongst forest officials from One state to another? Forest officers have larger obligations than policeman in cities. They patrol large systems of uninhabited forests. A forest guard is alone in his duty, unlike a cops officer in a city who can require back-up,” Chief Justice Bobde stated.
Amicus curiae A.D.N. Rao said States did not utilise funds indicated for arming the forest force.
Mr. Divan said forest officers brave enough to act were faced with a counterblast when they were made implicated in various criminal cases by effective forces running behind the poachers.
” Forest officers above a particular rank need arms for self-protection, bullet-proof vests, helmets and automobiles … the scenario is severe. They are defenseless and in threat, while poachers take undue benefit to carry out their wicked activities. It is challenging to imagine how any law can be implemented by forest personnel who are unarmed versus greatly armed poachers,” Chief Justice Bobde said.
The court asked the Lawyer General, Mr. Rao and Shyam Divan to make a joint submission on the procedures that might be embraced to secure the forest personnel so they might perform their task without fear. The court posted the case after four weeks.
CLICK ON THIS LINK TO FIND OUT MORE
( the headline, this story has not been published by Essential India News staff and is published from a syndicated feed.).