Joined conspirators on Army duty: Malegaon blast accused Prasad Shrikant Purohit to HC


    Signed up with conspirators on Army task: Malegaon blast implicated Prasad Shrikant Purohit to HC

    Lt Col Shrikant Prasad Purohit being required to the Sessions Court from Taloja Prison in Navi Mumbai. (PTI Photo/File)

    Malegaon bomb blast case implicated Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit on Wednesday informed the Bombay High Court, through his legal representative, that he was collecting intelligence for the Indian Army as part of his responsibility by going to conspiracy conferences for the 2008 blast.

    The high court was hearing Purohit’s application looking for that all charges against him in the event be dropped.

    6 people were killed and 100 others injured when a bomb strapped to a motorbike went off near a mosque in Malegaon city in Nashik district of Maharashtra on September 29, 2008.

    Neela Gokhale, the counsel for Purohit, who has actually been reserved under anti-terror laws by the National Examination Company (NIA), informed a bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik that he had been fulfilling conspirators and attending secret conferences in a bid to gather info and pass it on to the Army.

    Gokhale sent that Purohit was merely releasing his duties, and for that reason, the NIA must have gotten a prior sanction of the Central government to prosecute him.

    She stated the area 197( 2) of the CrPC (Criminal Treatment Code) disallowed a court from cognisance of any offense that had actually been dedicated by any member of the Army while acting in discharge of his or her duties without previous sanction of the Central federal government.

    Gokhale pointed out “files from the Indian Army, and former Mumbai joint commissioner of Mumbai Authorities, Himanshu Roy, applauding Purohit for the inputs and info he had actually allegedly shared with them throughout the years”.

    ” I (Prasad Shrikant Purohit) am explaining from these files that I was releasing my duty, penetrating in the groups and reporting to my superiors for safeguarding nationwide security,” Gokhale said.

    ” And for this work, they put me in jail, tortured me, and branded me a terrorist,” the counsel stated.

    In September in 2015, Purohit had actually submitted a pleain the HC seeking that all charges in the case against him be quashed.

    He submitted that the NIA, the prosecuting agency in the event, did not seek prior sanction under the Crook Treatment Code to prosecute him, for that reason, the courts could not have taken cognisance of the charges versus him.

    The NIA, nevertheless, opposed Purohit’s plea.

    In an affidavit filed in the high court in September in 2015, the NIA had said that in attending the conspiracy meetings, Purohit was not working for the Army and for that reason, no sanction under 197 of the CrPc was needed for his prosecution.

    Purohit was apprehended in the event in 2009.

    According to the NIA, the motorbike used in the blast came from Purohit’s co-accused and BJP MP Pragya Thakur.

    The HC will continue hearing the arguments in the event on February 2.

    ( the headline, this story has not been released by Important India News personnel and is released from a syndicated feed.).


    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here